• <blockquote id="o6sq2"><tfoot id="o6sq2"></tfoot></blockquote>
    <center id="o6sq2"></center>
  • <th id="o6sq2"><nav id="o6sq2"></nav></th>
  • <ul id="o6sq2"><tbody id="o6sq2"></tbody></ul>
      <samp id="o6sq2"></samp><ul id="o6sq2"><tbody id="o6sq2"></tbody></ul>

      sales@gninstruments.com

      Location -> News

      News

      Nitric Acid HNO₃ Magnetic Level Gauge Selection

      Nitric Acid HNO₃ Magnetic Level Gauge Selection

      Regarding the user's selection requirements for magnetic level gauges for 60% sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄) and 65% nitric acid (HNO₃), a key material mismatch was identified based on the parameters provided by technical personnel and the user's original requirements. The following is a detailed analysis and solution:
       
      I. Core Issue: Material Mismatch
      User Requirements:
      Valve Body/Flange Material: PVDF (Polyvinylidene Fluoride), specifically designed for highly corrosive media (such as concentrated sulfuric acid and nitric acid), exhibiting excellent chemical corrosion resistance, particularly suitable for 60% sulfuric acid and 65% nitric acid at 60℃.
       
      Pressure Rating: PN16 (4 bar), requiring material to meet both pressure resistance and corrosion resistance requirements.
       
      Technical Personnel Solution:
      Valve Body/Flange Material: PP (Polypropylene), with significantly weaker corrosion resistance than PVDF.
       
      PP Applicable Scenarios: Dilute acids (such as ≤30% sulfuric acid), mildly corrosive environments at room temperature.
       
      PP Risks: 60% sulfuric acid at 60℃ will accelerate the corrosion of PP, leading to leakage or equipment damage; PP may deform under 4 bar pressure, making long-term stable operation impossible.
       
      II. Solution: Material Upgrade and Parameter Confirmation
       
      Material Replacement Recommendations
      **PVDF Preferred:**
      **Advantages:** Resistant to corrosion from 60% sulfuric acid and 65% nitric acid; temperature resistance ≥80℃; pressure resistance up to 10 bar, fully covering user operating conditions.
       
      Application Case: Level measurement of highly corrosive media in the chemical and electroplating industries.
       
      Alternative Solutions (if budget is limited):
      * **PTFE-lined stainless steel (316L+PTFE):** Lined with PTFE, with an outer layer of pressure-bearing stainless steel. Cost is lower than full PVDF, but the reliability of the lining process needs to be confirmed.
      * **ETFE (ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene copolymer):** Corrosion resistance is close to PVDF, cost is slightly lower, but market application is less common.
       
      **Key Parameter Confirmation:**
      * **Drain/Air Plug:** It needs to be clarified whether the technical personnel's solution includes this. If not, a PVDF valve needs to be installed.
      * **Float Material:** It is recommended to use PVDF-wrapped magnets or 316L stainless steel floats to avoid corrosion-induced jamming.
      * **Flange Standard:** Confirm whether it is an lap joint type (EN 1092-1 PN16) to match the user's process piping. III. Recommended Configuration Table
       
      Item | User Requirements | Technical Personnel Solution | Recommended Solution
       
      Media | 60% H₂SO₄, 65% HNO₃ | Same as above | Same as above
       
      Maximum Pressure | 4 bar (PN16) | Pressure rating not specified | PVDF or PTFE-lined stainless steel (PN16)
       
      Maximum Temperature | 60℃ | Not specified | Same as above
       
      Valve Body/Flange Material | PVDF | PP | PVDF or PTFE-lined stainless steel
       
      Installation Method | Side-mounted | Side-mounted | Same as above
       
      Center Distance | 700mm | 700mm | Same as above
       
      Flange Type | Overlap (PN16, EN 1092-1) | Not specified | Overlap (PN16, EN 1092-1)
       
      Process Connection | DN50 | DN50 | Same as above
       
      Drain/Exhaust Plug | Requirement | Not mentioned | Install PVDF drain/exhaust valve
       
      IV. Action Recommendations
      Immediately provide feedback to technical personnel: Clearly state that PP material is unsuitable and request a PVDF or PTFE-lined stainless steel solution. Cost and Delivery Communication: PVDF level gauges are typically 30%-50% more expensive than PP gauges, but offer greater long-term reliability. If the user accepts the alternative, the lining process and delivery time must be confirmed.
       
      Sample Testing (Optional): Providing PVDF material samples for corrosion testing (e.g., immersion experiments) enhances user confidence.
       
      Emergency Alternative: If the user insists on using the existing solution, a risk disclosure statement must be signed, clearly outlining the corrosion risk of PP material at 60% sulfuric acid/60℃ and the potential consequences.
       
      V. Summary: The current solution requires adjustment due to material incompatibility (PP cannot withstand 60% sulfuric acid/nitric acid and 4 bar pressure). We recommend using a PVDF magnetic level gauge with a supplementary drain/vent plug design to ensure long-term stable operation under strong corrosion and high pressure conditions. For further technical support or quotations, please contact:
      CIXIFM Winny
      Email: sales01@cxflowmeter.com
      WhatsApp: +86 18049841995



       

      Last:沒有了 Next:Superheated Steam Vortex Flow M..

      Contact Us

      Office Address: Room 402, No. 650, Xinzhuan Rd., Jiuting Town, Songjiang District, Shanghai, China (Mainland)

      Phone:021-57635022

      E-mail:info@gnflowmeter.com

      E-mail:sales@gninstruments.com

      關(guān)閉
    • <blockquote id="o6sq2"><tfoot id="o6sq2"></tfoot></blockquote>
      <center id="o6sq2"></center>
    • <th id="o6sq2"><nav id="o6sq2"></nav></th>
    • <ul id="o6sq2"><tbody id="o6sq2"></tbody></ul>
        <samp id="o6sq2"></samp><ul id="o6sq2"><tbody id="o6sq2"></tbody></ul>